---
title: Identify the response most appropriate where a judge advances a cons… — Mock ethics olympiad · tree and pragmatics
description: Identify the response most appropriate where a judge advances a consideration which the team has not previously examined. Exam question 2 of lesson 50 «Mock ethics olympiad» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, with the dependency tree and pragmatics of the question and of each op
---

<!-- md -->
[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/e2/)

<!-- crumbs -->
[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [corpora](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/) / [questions](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/) / [Religion ethics](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/) / [Mock ethics olympiad](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/) / e2

# Exam question 2 · Mock ethics olympiad

<!-- .ven lang=en -->
Identify the response most appropriate where a judge advances a consideration which the team has not previously examined.

<!-- .vintro -->
**Mova's choice:** option 1 · **The right answer:** option 2 · wrong ✗ · **Who acts:** you, judge, team, consideration · **What happens:** identify, advance, have, not examine · **To what, where:** response, consideration

<!-- .vabout -->
This is exam question 2 of lesson 50 «Mock ethics olympiad» of the religion ethics course of Mova's primary school, asked in stiff, formal language. The page gives the question's syntax tree — a dependency tree in the style of Universal Dependencies — and its pragmatics clause by clause, then the 4 options as the student saw them, each with its tree and pragmatics. Every text is parsed by Mova itself. How the student answered it, with the score of every option and why: [the test at school](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/school-run/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/#e2).

## The question {#question}

```conllu
# sent_id = question:religion-ethics:50-mock-ethics-olympiad:e2:1
# text = Identify the response most appropriate where a judge advances a consideration which the team has not previously examined.
1	Identify	identify	VERB	VB	Mood=Imp|VerbForm=Fin	0	root	_	_
2	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	3	det	_	_
3	response	response	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	1	obj	_	_
4	most	most	ADV	RBS	Degree=Sup	5	advmod	_	_
5	appropriate	appropriate	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	3	amod	_	_
6	where	where	ADV	WRB	PronType=Rel	9	advmod	_	_
7	a	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	8	det	_	_
8	judge	judge	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	9	nsubj	_	_
9	advances	advance	VERB	VBZ	Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	5	advcl	_	_
10	a	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	11	det	_	_
11	consideration	consideration	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	9	obj	_	_
12	which	which	PRON	WDT	PronType=Rel	15	obj	_	_
13	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	14	det	_	_
14	team	team	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	15	nsubj	_	_
15	has	have	VERB	VBZ	Mood=Ind|Number=Sing|Person=3|Tense=Pres|VerbForm=Fin	11	acl:relcl	_	_
16	not	not	PART	RB	Polarity=Neg	18	advmod	_	_
17	previously	previously	ADV	RB	_	18	advmod	_	_
18	examined	examine	VERB	VBN	Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass	15	xcomp	_	SpaceAfter=No
19	.	.	PUNCT	.	_	1	punct	_	_
```

<!-- .fr -->
| # | verb | tense, mood | who | what, whom | to whom | where | when | other | roles by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **identify** | imperative | you *not said here* | the response |  |  |  |  | vn characterize-29.2-1-1 «NP V NP S\_ING»: agent=Agent response=Theme |
| 2 | **advance** | present | a judge | a consideration |  |  |  |  | vn caused\_calibratable\_cos-45.6.2-1 «NP V NP.patient»: agent=Causer consideration=Patient |
| 3 | **have** | present | the team | a consideration |  |  |  |  | tree rules |
| 4 | **not** **examine** | participle | a consideration *not said here* |  |  |  |  | previously *property* | vn assessment-34.1 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent |

<!-- .note -->
One row per clause the reader finds. «not said here»: a role filled from the clause above. «roles by»: a VerbNet class and frame when one fits the verb, else the reader's rules on the tree.

## The options {#options}

### Option 1 · ← Mova's choice {#o1}

<!-- .ven lang=en -->
The redirection of the discussion towards some more familiar and comfortable subject

```conllu
# sent_id = question:religion-ethics:50-mock-ethics-olympiad:e2:o1:1
# text = The redirection of the discussion towards some more familiar and comfortable subject
1	The	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	2	det	_	_
2	redirection	redirection	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	12	nsubj	_	_
3	of	of	ADP	IN	_	5	case	_	_
4	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	5	det	_	_
5	discussion	discussion	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	2	nmod	_	_
6	towards	towards	SCONJ	IN	_	9	mark	_	_
7	some	some	DET	DT	PronType=Ind	9	nsubj	_	_
8	more	more	ADV	RBR	Degree=Cmp	9	advmod	_	_
9	familiar	familiar	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	12	amod	_	_
10	and	and	CCONJ	CC	_	11	cc	_	_
11	comfortable	comfortable	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	9	conj	_	_
12	subject	subject	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	0	root	_	_
```

<!-- .note -->
The frames reader finds no event or fact in this sentence.

### Option 2 · ✓ the right answer {#o2}

<!-- .ven lang=en -->
An honest acknowledgement of the omission, followed by reasoned reflection upon it

```conllu
# sent_id = question:religion-ethics:50-mock-ethics-olympiad:e2:o2:1
# text = An honest acknowledgement of the omission, followed by reasoned reflection upon it
1	An	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	3	det	_	_
2	honest	honest	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	3	amod	_	_
3	acknowledgement	acknowledgement	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	0	root	_	_
4	of	of	ADP	IN	_	6	case	_	_
5	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	6	det	_	_
6	omission	omission	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	3	nmod	_	SpaceAfter=No
7	,	,	PUNCT	,	_	8	punct	_	_
8	followed	follow	VERB	VBN	Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass	3	acl:relcl	_	_
9	by	by	ADP	IN	_	11	case	_	_
10	reasoned	reasoned	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	11	amod	_	_
11	reflection	reflection	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	8	obl	_	_
12	upon	upon	ADP	IN	_	13	case	_	_
13	it	it	PRON	PRP	Case=Acc|Gender=Neut|Number=Sing|Person=3|PronType=Prs	11	nmod	_	_
```

<!-- .fr -->
| # | verb | tense, mood | who | what, whom | to whom | where | when | other | roles by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **follow** | participle |  | a honest acknowledgement of the omission *not said here* |  |  |  | by reasoned reflection upon reflection | vn occur-48.3-1 «NP V PP»: agent=Theme by reflection=Location |

### Option 3 {#o3}

<!-- .ven lang=en -->
A refusal to address the consideration so advanced

```conllu
# sent_id = question:religion-ethics:50-mock-ethics-olympiad:e2:o3:1
# text = A refusal to address the consideration so advanced
1	A	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	2	det	_	_
2	refusal	refusal	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	4	nsubj	_	_
3	to	to	PART	TO	_	4	mark	_	_
4	address	address	VERB	VB	VerbForm=Inf	0	root	_	_
5	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	6	det	_	_
6	consideration	consideration	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	4	obj	_	_
7	so	so	ADV	RB	_	8	advmod	_	_
8	advanced	advanced	ADJ	JJ	Degree=Pos	4	xcomp	_	_
```

<!-- .fr -->
| # | verb | tense, mood | who | what, whom | to whom | where | when | other | roles by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **address** | to-infinitive | a refusal | the consideration |  |  |  | advanced *property* | vn illustrate-25.3 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent consideration=Destination |

### Option 4 {#o4}

<!-- .ven lang=en -->
The fabrication of an answer intended to conceal the omission

```conllu
# sent_id = question:religion-ethics:50-mock-ethics-olympiad:e2:o4:1
# text = The fabrication of an answer intended to conceal the omission
1	The	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	2	det	_	_
2	fabrication	fabrication	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	6	nsubj:pass	_	_
3	of	of	ADP	IN	_	5	case	_	_
4	an	a	DET	DT	Definite=Ind|PronType=Art	5	det	_	_
5	answer	answer	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	2	nmod	_	_
6	intended	intend	VERB	VBN	Tense=Past|VerbForm=Part|Voice=Pass	0	root	_	_
7	to	to	PART	TO	_	8	mark	_	_
8	conceal	conceal	VERB	VB	VerbForm=Inf	6	xcomp	_	_
9	the	the	DET	DT	Definite=Def|PronType=Art	10	det	_	_
10	omission	omission	NOUN	NN	Number=Sing	8	obj	_	_
```

<!-- .fr -->
| # | verb | tense, mood | who | what, whom | to whom | where | when | other | roles by |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | **intend** | participle · passive |  | the fabrication of a answer |  |  |  |  | tree rules |
| 2 | **conceal** *not said to happen* | to-infinitive |  | the omission |  |  |  |  | vn concealment-16 «NP V NP»: agent=Agent omission=Patient |
| 3 | **fabricate** |  |  | a answer |  |  |  |  | nom fabrication «communication transitive»: of=patient |

<!-- div src -->

**Text:** the tests of Mova's primary school, written for Mova (`world/data/school/`), as the course runner gave them to the student. **Trees:** Mova's own parse — the `en` model on the CPU, when the site is built — not checked by a teacher; they may be wrong. **Frames:** Mova's frames reader (`prag`), each text read on its own. Elamur Cosmic License.

<!-- /div -->

<!-- pn -->
- ← previous: [Mock ethics olympiad, exam 1](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/e1/)
- next →: [Mock ethics olympiad, exam 3](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/e3/)
- ↑ back to [Mock ethics olympiad](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/corpora/questions/religion-ethics/50-mock-ethics-olympiad/)