[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/eduardo-blanco/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [authors](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/) / Eduardo Blanco

# Eduardo Blanco

2 paper cards in Mova's library · 2020–2022

Eduardo Blanco wrote 2 of the papers Mova reads, in 2020–2022; often with Aaron Mathews, Anirudh Kaza, Anusha Kakileti.

[OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/A5101756071) · [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-3437) · [**h-index 17**](https://openalex.org/authors/A5101756071) · [1251 citations](https://openalex.org/authors/A5101756071) · [120 works](https://openalex.org/works?filter=author.id:A5101756071) — openalex, 2026-10-18

The profile is the library's match of the name; two people with one name are not always told apart.

Elsewhere: [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=search_authors&mauthors=Eduardo+Blanco) · [Semantic Scholar](https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Eduardo+Blanco) · [dblp](https://dblp.org/search?q=Eduardo+Blanco) · [ACL Anthology](https://aclanthology.org/search/?q=Eduardo+Blanco) · [ORCID](https://orcid.org/orcid-search/search?searchQuery=Eduardo+Blanco)

## Papers

1. **[Disentangling Indirect Answers to Yes-No Questions in Real Conversations](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/sanagavarapu-2022-disentangling-indirect-answers-yes-no/)** *(2022)* The authors take every yes/no question in the Switchboard Dialog Act corpus whose next turn is not a direct answer: 2,544 questions, which is 43.5% of all yes/no questions there (77% of conversations have one); 41% of the questions are themselves indirect, without a question mark («I don't know if you're familiar…
2. **[An Analysis of Natural Language Inference Benchmarks through the Lens of Negation](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hossain-2020-analysis-natural-language-inference-benchmarks/)** *(2020)* The paper asks how much negation matters in natural language inference (NLI) benchmarks. Negation occurs in 8.69% to 29.92% of sentences in general English corpora, but in only 7.16% of RTE pairs and 1.19% of SNLI pairs (MNLI: 22.63%). In most of the negated pairs the negation can be ignored without changing the…

## Co-authors (12)

- Aaron Mathews
- Anirudh Kaza
- Anusha Kakileti
- Elizabeth Wei
- Helen Li
- Jathin Singaraju
- Krishna Sanagavarapu
- Md Mosharaf Hossain
- Nathan Brito
- Pranoy Dutta
- Tiffany Kao
- Venelin Kovatchev
- [← previous Eduard Hovy](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/eduard-hovy/)
- [next → Ehud Reiter](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/ehud-reiter/)
- [↑ back to Authors](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/)