[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/timothy-osborne/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [authors](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/) / Timothy Osborne

# Timothy Osborne

2 paper cards in Mova's library · 2017–2019

Timothy Osborne wrote 2 of the papers Mova reads, in 2017–2019, most of them on [Dependency parsing](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/topics/dependency-parsing/); often with Matthew Reeve.

[OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/A5026590666) · [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5685-357X) · [**h-index 24**](https://openalex.org/authors/A5026590666) · [1480 citations](https://openalex.org/authors/A5026590666) · [63 works](https://openalex.org/works?filter=author.id:A5026590666) — openalex, 2026-10-18

The profile is the library's match of the name; two people with one name are not always told apart.

Elsewhere: [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=search_authors&mauthors=Timothy+Osborne) · [Semantic Scholar](https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Timothy+Osborne) · [dblp](https://dblp.org/search?q=Timothy+Osborne) · [ACL Anthology](https://aclanthology.org/search/?q=Timothy+Osborne) · [ORCID](https://orcid.org/orcid-search/search?searchQuery=Timothy+Osborne)

Topics: [Dependency parsing](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/topics/dependency-parsing/) 2

## Papers

1. **[Predicate Catenae: A Dependency Grammar Analysis of It-Clefts](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/osborne-2019-predicate-catenae-dependency-grammar-analysis/)** *(2019)* An it-cleft such as "It was herself that Susan critiqued" has two finite verbs, yet the reflexive in the matrix clause is licensed by "Susan" in the embedded clause.
2. **[Control vs. Raising in English. A Dependency Grammar Account](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/osborne-2017-control-vs-raising-english-dependency/)** *(2017)* The paper argues that a dependency grammar cannot tell control predicates (prefer, ask, pretty) from raising predicates (seem, expect, tough) by tree shape alone, because both take a to-infinitive and get the same flat structure.

## Co-authors (1)

- Matthew Reeve
- [← previous Timothy Dozat](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/timothy-dozat/)
- [next → Toby Jia-Jun Li](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/toby-jia-jun-li/)
- [↑ back to Authors](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/)