[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-6/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [cited-by](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/) / Who cites «Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems» · page 6

# Who cites «Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems» · page 6

579 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. [← the card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension/)

Pages: [1](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension/) · [2](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-2/) · [3](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-3/) · [4](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-4/) · [5](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-5/) · **6**

1. jin-2025-trapdoc-deceiving-llm-users-injecting
2. junior-2021-uma-revisao-breve-sobre-perguntas
3. kim-2024-ku-dmis-ehrsql-2024-generating
4. korakakis-2025-mitigating-shortcut-learning-interpolated-learning
5. kumar-2019-understanding-behaviour-neural-abstractive-summarizers
6. kurosawa-2022-logical-inference-counting-semi-structured
7. lee-2025-curriculum-debiasing-robust-parameter-efficient
8. li-2023-exploring-schema-generalizability-text-sql
9. li-2023-perturbscore-connecting-discrete-continuous-perturbations
10. li-2025-hellaswag-pro-large-scale-bilingual
11. lin-2023-training-nli-models-through-universal
12. ling-2023-enhancing-unsupervised-semantic-parsing-distributed
13. liu-2020-uncertainty-modeling-machine-comprehension-systems
14. liu-2023-system-report-ccl23-eval-task
15. liu-2024-shortcuts-triggers-backdoor-defense-denoised
16. liu-2026-factuality-meta-factivity-cognitive-blueprint
17. loginova-2018-interactive-web-interface-visualizing-inner
18. longpre-2021-transferability-minimal-prediction-preserving-inputs
19. lou-2022-spa-sparsity-virtual-adversarial-training
20. lymperopoulos-2024-optimal-efficient-text-counterfactuals-graph
21. majumder-2021-model-agnostic-answer-reranking-system
22. manafi-2024-cross-lingual-transfer-robustness-lower
23. merkhofer-2021-perceptual-models-machine-edited-text
24. mosbach-2023-analyzing-pre-trained-fine-tuned
25. mozes-2022-identifying-human-strategies-generating-word
26. murty-2023-pseudointelligence-unifying-lens-language-model
27. nakanishi-2018-answerable-or-not-devising-dataset
28. nakashole-2025-typology-guided-adaptation-multilingual-models
29. newcomb-2023-explaining-math-word-problem-solvers
30. nguyen-2023-firo-finite-context-indexing-restricted
31. nolano-2024-pointing-out-shortcomings-relation-extraction
32. park-2024-robust-ralms-revealing-impact-imperfect
33. popa-2021-contribution-d-informations-syntaxiques-aux
34. raina-2024-extreme-miscalibration-illusion-adversarial-robustness
35. reich-2022-leveraging-expert-guided-adversarial-augmentation
36. rychalska-2018-how-much-should-you-ask
37. sakib-2025-spurious-correlations-beyond-understanding-mitigating
38. samadi-2021-attacks-against-ranking-algorithms-text
39. satheesh-2025-robustness-evaluation-german-extractive-question
40. shaier-2024-it-is-not-about-what
41. shaier-2025-malamute-multilingual-highly-granular-template
42. si-2023-compressing-debiasing-vision-language-pre
43. sogaard-2021-locke-s-holiday-belief-bias
44. son-2021-sepp-similarity-estimation-predicted-probabilities
45. stacey-2020-avoiding-hypothesis-only-bias-natural
46. sterz-2025-dare-diverse-visual-question-answering
47. su-2024-unveiling-narrative-reasoning-limits-large
48. sugawara-2023-degrees-freedom-defining-testing-natural
49. sui-2025-kristeva-close-reading-as-novel
50. sun-2020-robust-unsupervised-neural-machine-translation
51. sun-2023-textverifier-robustness-verification-textual-classifiers
52. tran-2023-impacts-unanswerable-questions-robustness-machine
53. tran-2024-robust-extractive-question-answering-models
54. vath-2021-beyond-accuracy-consolidated-tool-visual
55. wang-2024-da-3-distribution-aware-adversarial
56. wang-2024-reinforcement-learning-driven-llm-agent
57. wang-2025-adversarial-defense-without-adversarial-defense
58. wecker-2020-clusterdatasplit-exploring-challenging-clustering-based
59. wessel-2025-llm-based-adversarial-dataset-augmentation
60. wu-2021-variation-generality-encoding-syntactic-anomaly
61. wu-2022-precisely-point-adversarial-augmentations-faithful
62. wu-2022-robustness-cognate-generation-models
63. wysocki-2023-transformers-representation-biomedical-background-knowledge
64. xu-2024-earth-is-flat-because-investigating
65. yang-2023-measuring-consistency-text-based-financial
66. yao-2025-paretorag-leveraging-sentence-context-attention
67. yin-2022-addmu-detection-far-boundary-adversarial
68. zevallos-2024-tema-token-embeddings-mapping-enriching
69. zhan-2024-rethinking-word-level-adversarial-attack
70. zhang-2021-adversarial-attack-against-cross-lingual
71. zhang-2021-profanity-avoiding-training-framework-seq2seq
72. zhang-2022-sharp-search-based-adversarial-attack
73. zhang-2023-learning-ignore-adversarial-attacks
74. zhang-2025-qava-query-agnostic-visual-attack
75. zheng-2022-plugat-plug-play-module-defend
76. zheng-2023-natlogattack-framework-attacking-natural-language
77. zhong-2019-detecting-reducing-bias-high-stakes
78. zhu-2022-duqm-chinese-dataset-linguistically-perturbed
79. zhu-2025-taebench-improving-quality-toxic-adversarial

Pages: [1](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension/) · [2](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-2/) · [3](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-3/) · [4](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-4/) · [5](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-5/) · **6**

- [← previous Who cites «Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems» · page 5](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jia-2017-adversarial-examples-evaluating-reading-comprehension-5/)
- [next → Who cites «He Thinks He Knows Better than the Doctors: BERT for Event Factuality Fails on Pragmatics»](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/jiang-2021-he-thinks-he-knows-better/)
- [↑ back to papers/cited-by/](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/)