[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/silveira-2015-does-universal-dependencies-need-parsing/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [cited-by](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/) / Who cites «Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of English»

# Who cites «Does Universal Dependencies need a parsing representation? An investigation of English»

10 papers of our library cite it, newest first: found in their bibliographies, which we read ourselves. [← the card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/silveira-2015-does-universal-dependencies-need-parsing/)

1. [Comparing learnability of two dependency schemes: `semantic'' (UD) and `syntactic'' (SUD)](https://aclanthology.org/2021.findings-emnlp.256/) *— 2021 · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021*
2. [The status of function words in dependency grammar: A critique of Universal Dependencies (UD)](https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5124/) *— 2019 · Glossa: a journal of general linguistics*
3. [Automatically Selecting the Best Dependency Annotation Design with Dynamic Oracles](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/bank-2018-wisniewski-automatically-selecting-best-dependency-annotation/) *— our card · 2018 · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers)*
4. [A Systematic Comparison of Syntactic Representations of Dependency Parsing](https://aclanthology.org/W17-0419/) *— 2017 · Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2017)*
5. [Multilingual Back-and-Forth Conversion between Content and Function Head for Easy Dependency Parsing](https://aclanthology.org/E17-2001/) *— 2017 · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers*
6. [Universal Dependencies are Hard to Parse – or are They?](https://aclanthology.org/W17-6525/) *— 2017 · Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017)*
7. [From Noisy Questions to Minecraft Texts: Annotation Challenges in Extreme Syntax Scenario](https://aclanthology.org/W16-3905/) *— 2016 · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (WNUT)*
8. [Should Have, Would Have, Could Have. Investigating Verb Group Representations for Parsing with Universal Dependencies.](https://aclanthology.org/W16-1202/) *— 2016 · Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual and Cross-lingual Methods in NLP*
9. constant-2017-benchmarking-joint-lexical-syntactic-analysis
10. patejuk-2019-coordination-unlike-grammatical-functions
- [← previous Who cites «A Massive Scale Semantic Similarity Dataset of Historical English»](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/silcock-2023-massive-scale-semantic-similarity-dataset/)
- [next → Who cites «A Survey of Machine Translation: Its History, Current Status and Future Prospects»](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/slocum-1985-survey-machine-translation-its-history/)
- [↑ back to papers/cited-by/](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/cited-by/)