[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2026-andrason-toward-ocean-biblical-hebrew-verbal/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [Ancient Hebrew](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo/) / Toward the Ocean of the Biblical Hebrew Verbal System

# Toward the Ocean of the Biblical Hebrew Verbal System

**Authors:** [Alexander Andrason](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/authors/alexander-andrason/) · **Year:** 2015 (Folia Orientalia 52; the catalogue gives 2026, the date it was indexed) · **Venue:** Folia Orientalia 52, 15 ff. **Link:** [wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/7021](https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/7021) · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

[**0** citations](https://openalex.org/works?filter=cites:W7215154603) openalex · 2026-10-19[Folia Orientalia](https://openalex.org/S4306510657)[licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

- [Publisher's page](https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/7021)
- [PDF](https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/download/7021/5835)
- [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W7215154603)

**Authors (1)**

1. [Alexander Andrason](https://openalex.org/A5025732228) [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8507-9824) · h 14 · 764 citations · 185 works

Citations and author metrics from openalex (2026-10-19); authors with the same name are not always told apart.

## What it is about

The paper lifts the author's semantic-map approach from single verb forms to the whole system. Each form is placed on a cross-linguistic grammaticalization path, with its senses weighted by frequency ("waves"): qatal and wayyiqtol on the resultative path (resultative → perfect → perfective past), yiqtol (ongoing → habitual → future → modal) and the participle qotel (ongoing → habitual → future) on the imperfective path, and weqatal (non-modal → semi-modal → modal) and short yiqtol, the jussive (semi-modal → modal), on the modal-contamination path. The two forms on each path are combined into a "current" whose peaks show the semantic domains that the pair covers: taxis and perfective past for the resultative current, habitual and future for the imperfective, semi-modal and modal for the modal one; the three currents together form the system, the "ocean". The paper is programmatic, with figures but no new counts, and the author calls it a first step.

## Ideas

- I1. Use the paper's six path statements as the default sense order for each form when Mova glosses a verb: try the senses in path order and let context choose (e.g. yiqtol: ongoing in a participle-like context, habitual in a past-iterative chain, future in speech, modal after a volitive or in a command). The order gives a deterministic tie-break that can be explained.
- I2. Present the verb system in the manual as three pairs on three paths (qatal/wayyiqtol, yiqtol/qotel, weqatal/jussive), with Torah counts for each form, as one of the views in the aspect–tense debate.

## For Mova

I1 is a rule order for verb glosses in the Torah dictionary's examples and for the tense of events in the world read from the trees; it pairs with I2 of the Andrason 2017 card (`hbo-2026-andrason-against-binarism-simplicity-neatness-stasis`), which supplies the frequencies. I2 is text for [The verb](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/languages/hbo/06-verb/) (the aspect–tense debate). No measurement in the paper itself.

## Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work.

```
@inproceedings{andrason2026toward,
  title = {{Toward the Ocean of the Biblical Hebrew Verbal System}},
  author = {Andrason, Alexander},
  booktitle = {Folia Orientalia},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://wydawnictwo.pan.pl/index.php/fo/article/view/7021}
}
```

- [← previous Against Binarism, Simplicity, Neatness and Stasis: A Theoretical Prolegomenon to the Reality of Verbal Grams in Biblical Hebrew](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2026-andrason-against-binarism-simplicity-neatness-stasis/)
- [next → Identifying Phrase Boundaries in the Samaritan Pentateuch with Machine Learning](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2026-cantanhede-identifying-phrase-boundaries-samaritan-pentateuch/)
- [↑ back to Ancient Hebrew](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo/)

## References

32 references, 4 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Andersen, D., 2000. The Evolution of the Hebrew Verbal System. Zeitschrift für Althebraistik 13/1. 1–66. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andersen%2C+D%2E%2C+2000%2E+The+Evolution+of+the+Hebrew+Verbal+System%2E+Zeitschrift+f%C3%BCr+Althebraistik+13%2F1%2E+1%E2%80%9366%2E)
2. Andrason, A. 2010. The panchronic yiqtol. Functionally consistent and cognitively plausible. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 10/10. 1–63. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2010%2E+The+panchronic+yiqtol%2E+Functionally+consistent+and+cognitively+plausible%2E+Journal+of+Hebrew+Scriptures+10%2F10%2E+1%E2%80%9363%2E) [our card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2010-andrason-panchronic-yiqtol-functionally-consistent-cognitively/)
3. Andrason, A. 2011a. The Biblical Hebrew Wayyiqtol – a dynamic definition. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 11/7. 1–50. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2011a%2E+The+Biblical+Hebrew+Wayyiqtol+%E2%80%93+a+dynamic+definition%2E+Journal+of+Hebrew+Scriptures+11%2F7%2E+1%E2%80%9350%2E) [our card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2011-andrason-biblical-hebrew-wayyiqtol-dynamic-definition/)
4. Andrason, A. 2011b. The BH weqatal. A homogenous form with no haphazard functions. Part 1. Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 37/2. 1–25. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2011b%2E+The+BH+weqatal%2E+A+homogenous+form+with+no+haphazard+functions%2E+Part+1%2E+Journal+of+Northwest+Semitic+Languages+37%2F2%2E+1%E2%80%9325%2E)
5. Andrason, A. 2011c. The Biblical Hebrew verbal system in light of grammaticalization – the second generation. Hebrew Studies 52. 19–53. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2011c%2E+The+Biblical+Hebrew+verbal+system+in+light+of+grammaticalization+%E2%80%93+the+second+generation%2E+Hebrew+Studies+52%2E+19%E2%80%9353%2E)
6. Andrason, A. 2012a. Making it sound – Performative qatal and its explanation. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 12/8. 1–58. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2012a%2E+Making+it+sound+%E2%80%93+Performative+qatal+and+its+explanation%2E+Journal+of+Hebrew+Scriptures+12%2F8%2E+1%E2%80%9358%2E)
7. Andrason, A. 2012b. The gnomic qatal. Orientalia Suecana 61. 5–53. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2012b%2E+The+gnomic+qatal%2E+Orientalia+Suecana+61%2E+5%E2%80%9353%2E)
8. Andrason, A. 2012c. The BH weqatal. A homogenous form with no haphazard functions. Part 2. Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 38/1. 1–30. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2012c%2E+The+BH+weqatal%2E+A+homogenous+form+with+no+haphazard+functions%2E+Part+2%2E+Journal+of+Northwest+Semitic+Languages+38%2F1%2E+1%E2%80%9330%2E)
9. Andrason, A. 2012d. The dynamic short yiqtol. Journal for Semitics 21/2. 308–339. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2012d%2E+The+dynamic+short+yiqtol%2E+Journal+for+Semitics+21%2F2%2E+308%E2%80%93339%2E)
10. Andrason, A. 2013a. Future values of the qatal are “logical” – How to chain future senses of the qatalto the core of its semantic network? Hebrew Studies5. 7–38. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2013a%2E+Future+values+of+the+qatal+are+%E2%80%9Clogical%E2%80%9D+%E2%80%93+How+to+chain+future+senses+of+the+qatalto+the+core+of+its+semantic+network%3F+Hebrew+Studies5%2E+7%E2%80%9338%2E)
11. Andrason, A. 2013b. Qotel and its dynamics. Part 1.Folia Orientalia 50. 81–112. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2013b%2E+Qotel+and+its+dynamics%2E+Part+1%2EFolia+Orientalia+50%2E+81%E2%80%93112%2E)
12. Andrason, A. 2013c. An optative indicative? A real factual past? A cognitive-typological approach to the precative qatal. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 13/4. 1–41. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2013c%2E+An+optative+indicative%3F+A+real+factual+past%3F+A+cognitive%2Dtypological+approach+to+the+precative+qatal%2E+Journal+of+Hebrew+Scriptures+13%2F4%2E+1%E2%80%9341%2E)
13. Andrason, A. 2013d. El sistema verbal hebreo en su contexto semítico: una visión dinámica. Estella. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2013d%2E+El+sistema+verbal+hebreo+en+su+contexto+sem%C3%ADtico%3A+una+visi%C3%B3n+din%C3%A1mica%2E+Estella%2E)
14. Andrason, A. 2014a. From resultatives to present tenses – simultaneous path of resultative constructions. Italian Journal of Linguistics 26/1. 1–58. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2014a%2E+From+resultatives+to+present+tenses+%E2%80%93+simultaneous+path+of+resultative+constructions%2E+Italian+Journal+of+Linguistics+26%2F1%2E+1%E2%80%9358%2E)
15. Andrason, A. 2014b. Qotel and its dynamics. Part 2. Folia Orientalia 51. 139–153. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+2014b%2E+Qotel+and+its+dynamics%2E+Part+2%2E+Folia+Orientalia+51%2E+139%E2%80%93153%2E)
16. Andrason, A. (forthcoming (a)) The complexity of verbal semantics – an intricate relationship between QATAL and WAYYIQTOL. Journal of Hebrew Scriptures. Andrason, A. (forthcoming (b)) Semantic maps, waves and streams – A pilot model of grammaticalization approach to BH verbal semantics with the inclusion of quantitative data and maps’ interaction. In: C. Miller-Naudé, J. Naudé (eds.) Biblical Hebrew Verbal System. Winona Lake. Andrason, A.; K. Lyle. 2015. Functional schizophrenia of the Biblical Hebrew bli and its cognitive modeling (Part 1). Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 41/1. 1–36. Andrason, A.; K. Lyle. (forthcoming) Functional schizophrenia of the Biblical Hebrew bli and its cognitive modeling (Part 2). Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 41/2. Andrason, A.; C. H. J. van der Merwe. (forthcoming) The semantic potential of verbal conjugations as a polysemous set of senses: the qatal in Genesis. Hebrew Studies 56. Andrason, A.; M. Visser. (forthcoming) Affordances perspective and grammaticalization – incorporation of language, environment and users in the model of semantic paths. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 5/4. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Andrason%2C+A%2E+%28forthcoming+%28a%29%29+The+complexity+of+verbal+semantics+%E2%80%93+an+intricate+relationship+between+QATAL+and+WAYYIQTOL%2E+Journal+of+Hebrew+Scriptures%2E+Andrason%2C+A%2E+%28forthcoming+%28b%29%29+Semantic+maps%2C+w) [our card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2016-andrason-complexity-verbal-semanticsan-intricate-relationship/)
17. Bosman, T. 2011. Biblical Hebrew lexicology and cognitive semantics: A study of lexemes of affection. PhD Dissertation. University of Stellenbosch. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bosman%2C+T%2E+2011%2E+Biblical+Hebrew+lexicology+and+cognitive+semantics%3A+A+study+of+lexemes+of+affection%2E+PhD+Dissertation%2E+University+of+Stellenbosch%2E)
18. Bybee, J.; R. Perkins; W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bybee%2C+J%2E%3B+R%2E+Perkins%3B+W%2E+Pagliuca%2E+1994%2E+The+Evolution+of+Grammar%2E+Chicago%2E)
19. Cook, J. 2012. Time and Biblical Hebrew Verb. Winona Lake. Dahl, Ö. 1985.Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Cook%2C+J%2E+2012%2E+Time+and+Biblical+Hebrew+Verb%2E+Winona+Lake%2E+Dahl%2C+%C3%96%2E+1985%2ETense+and+Aspect+Systems%2E+Oxford%2E)
20. Dahl, Ö. 2000. (ed.) 2000b. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Dahl%2C+%C3%96%2E+2000%2E+%28ed%2E%29+2000b%2E+Tense+and+Aspect+in+the+Languages+of+Europe%2E+Berlin%2E)
21. De Blois, R. 2001. Towards a new dictionary of Biblical Hebrew based on semantic domains. England. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=De+Blois%2C+R%2E+2001%2E+Towards+a+new+dictionary+of+Biblical+Hebrew+based+on+semantic+domains%2E+England%2E)
22. De Haan, F. 2004. On representing semantic maps. E-MELD Language documentation conference 2004. Workshop on linguistic databases and best practice. University of Arizona, manuscript. 1–12 (www.emeld.org/workshop/2004/deHaan-paper.doc). [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=De+Haan%2C+F%2E+2004%2E+On+representing+semantic+maps%2E+E%2DMELD+Language+documentation+conference+2004%2E+Workshop+on+linguistic+databases+and+best+practice%2E+University+of+Arizona%2C+manuscript%2E+1%E2%80%9312+%28www%2Eemeld%2Eo)
23. Haspelmath, M. 1998. The Semantic Development of Old Presents: New Futures and Subjunctives without Grammaticalization. Diachronica 15/1. 29–62. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Haspelmath%2C+M%2E+1998%2E+The+Semantic+Development+of+Old+Presents%3A+New+Futures+and+Subjunctives+without+Grammaticalization%2E+Diachronica+15%2F1%2E+29%E2%80%9362%2E)
24. Haspelmath, M. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In: M. Tomasello (ed.) The New Psychology of Language. 211–242. Mahwah. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Haspelmath%2C+M%2E+2003%2E+The+geometry+of+grammatical+meaning+semantic+maps+and+cross%2Dlinguistic+comparison%2E+In%3A+M%2E+Tomasello+%28ed%2E%29+The+New+Psychology+of+Language%2E+211%E2%80%93242%2E+Mahwah%2E)
25. Heine, B.; U. Claudi; F. Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Heine%2C+B%2E%3B+U%2E+Claudi%3B+F%2E+H%C3%BCnnemeyer%2E+1991%2E+Grammaticalization%2E+A+Conceptual+Framework%2E+Chicago%2E)
26. Hopper, P; E. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hopper%2C+P%3B+E%2E+Traugott%2E+2003%2E+Grammaticalization%2E+Cambridge%2E)
27. Joosten, J. 2012. The Verbal System of Biblical Hebrew. Jerusalem. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Joosten%2C+J%2E+2012%2E+The+Verbal+System+of+Biblical+Hebrew%2E+Jerusalem%2E)
28. Lyle, K. 2013. A new Methodology for asserting the semantic potential of Biblical Hebrew prepositions. Hebrew Studies 54. 49–67. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lyle%2C+K%2E+2013%2E+A+new+Methodology+for+asserting+the+semantic+potential+of+Biblical+Hebrew+prepositions%2E+Hebrew+Studies+54%2E+49%E2%80%9367%2E)
29. Narrog, H.; J. van der Auwera. 2011. Grammaticalization and semantic maps. In: H. Narrog, B. Heine (eds.)The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. 318–327. Oxford. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Narrog%2C+H%2E%3B+J%2E+van+der+Auwera%2E+2011%2E+Grammaticalization+and+semantic+maps%2E+In%3A+H%2E+Narrog%2C+B%2E+Heine+%28eds%2E%29The+Oxford+Handbook+of+Grammaticalization%2E+318%E2%80%93327%2E+Oxford%2E)
30. Van der Merwe, CHJ; A. Andrason. 2014. Finite Infinite? “Finite” uses of the BH Infinitive Absolute and their Rationale. Journal of Semitic Studies 59/2. 255–296. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Van+der+Merwe%2C+CHJ%3B+A%2E+Andrason%2E+2014%2E+Finite+Infinite%3F+%E2%80%9CFinite%E2%80%9D+uses+of+the+BH+Infinitive+Absolute+and+their+Rationale%2E+Journal+of+Semitic+Studies+59%2F2%2E+255%E2%80%93296%2E)
31. Westbury, J. R. 2014. Left Dislocation in Biblical Hebrew: A Cognitive Linguistic Account. PhD Dissertation. University of Stellenbosch. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Westbury%2C+J%2E+R%2E+2014%2E+Left+Dislocation+in+Biblical+Hebrew%3A+A+Cognitive+Linguistic+Account%2E+PhD+Dissertation%2E+University+of+Stellenbosch%2E) [our card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/hbo-2014-westbury-left-dislocation-biblical-hebrew-cognitive/)
32. Zwarts, J. 2010. Semantic Map Geometry: Two Approaches. Linguistic Discovery 8/1. 377–395. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Zwarts%2C+J%2E+2010%2E+Semantic+Map+Geometry%3A+Two+Approaches%2E+Linguistic+Discovery+8%2F1%2E+377%E2%80%93395%2E)
