[Mova](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) · [this page in HTML](https://mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2021-rapoport-false-resultatives-interaction-agreement-creation/)

[home](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/) / [docs](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/) / [papers](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/) / [Semitic languages](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/sem/) / False resultatives: The interaction of agreement and creation in Northern Galilee Levantine Arabic

# False resultatives: The interaction of agreement and creation in Northern Galilee Levantine Arabic

**Authors:** Tova Rapoport; Aya Zarka · **Year:** 2021 · **Venue:** Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 19 **Link:** [glossa-journal.org/article/id/5399](https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/5399/) · library `lingbulk-2021-rapoport-false-resultatives-interaction-agreement-creation` · **Licence:** [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

[**2** citations](https://openalex.org/works?filter=cites:W3130827194) openalex · 2026-10-18[Glossa: a journal of general linguistics](https://openalex.org/S4210226983)[licence](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

- [Publisher's page](https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274)
- [PDF](https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/5399/galley/11059/download)
- [DOI 10.5334/gjgl.1274](https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274)
- [OpenAlex](https://openalex.org/W3130827194)

**Authors (2)**

1. [Tova Rapoport](https://openalex.org/A5033742389) [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1737-9232) · h 12 · 708 citations · 20 works
2. [Aya Zarka](https://openalex.org/A5080467666) [ORCID](https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-7144) · h 1 · 2 citations · 3 works

Citations and author metrics from openalex (2026-10-18); authors with the same name are not always told apart.

## What it is about

Resultative secondary predicates ("scrubbed the shirt clean") add an end state to an activity. The authors show that Northern Galilee Arabic, a Levantine dialect spoken by Druze in northern Israel, allows none of the true resultatives, but does allow false resultatives. A false resultative such as "sliced the bread thin" specifies a result that the verb already contains, so it does not change the aspect (the in-an-hour test) and does not entail that the object became thin. The data are judgements from native-speaker informants plus a few recorded examples. The key finding is that adjectival false resultatives come in two agreement patterns, and the pattern depends on whether the verb is an explicit creation verb (the created object is the thing modified) or an implicit one. Agreement therefore tracks the same distinction that Geuder and Levinson draw conceptually.

## Ideas

- I1. A lexical result flag: mark each verb whose meaning contains a result (slice, braid, sew, build) and let an adjective after it attach as a specification of that result, not as a new result. The aspect test in the paper (adverbial "in an hour" with and without the adjective) is the check. This belongs in the English frame builder, where it decides between "adds an end state" and "specifies the end state".
- I2. Two creation types as a verb feature: split creation verbs into explicit (the object is made, as in "built a table stable") and implicit (the object is changed into a shape, as in "sliced the bread thin") and use the entailment test of the paper, "X became A" versus "an A-thing was created", as the rule that picks the reading.
- I3. A small contrast set for testing: take the paper's English examples (sliced thin, braided tight, ground fine, built stable, sewed too tight against scrubbed clean and hammered flat) as a gold set with the entailment labels. It is a held-out test for I1 and I2, to be run once per release.

## For Mova

I1 goes into the event part of the English pipeline: `prag` for the result reading and `world` for the frame of a result-bearing verb. I2 is a lexicon feature in the `en` crate, and I3 is a test set for `prag`. The Arabic agreement data do not feed Mova now, since it does not parse Arabic yet; the card is kept for `treebanks/ar` only if that work starts.

## Cite

The paper itself, not this card. BibTeX from the library's record of the work. [DOI 10.5334/gjgl.1274](https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274)

```
@article{rapoport2021false,
  title = {{False resultatives: The interaction of agreement and creation in Northern Galilee Levantine Arabic}},
  author = {Rapoport, Tova and Zarka, Aya},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  year = {2021},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.1274},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274}
}
```

- [← previous BabyFST - Towards a Finite-State Based Computational Model of Ancient Babylonian](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2020-sahala-babyfst-finite-state-based-computational/)
- [next → Camel Treebank: An Open Multi-genre Arabic Dependency Treebank](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2022-habash-camel-treebank-open-multi-genre/)
- [↑ back to Semitic languages](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/sem/)

## References

53 references, 1 of them with a card of ours. ↗ leads to the work, «find» searches for one we have no id for yet.

1. Adger, David. 2012. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/ mitpress/9780262018616.001.0001 Akkuş, Faruk & Balkız Öztürk. 2017. On cognate objects in Sason Arabic. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1). 1–10. [↗](https://doi.org/10.7551/)
2. Al-Sammak, Mohammed. 2012. Cognate objects with unaccusative and unergative verbs in Arabic. California State University, Fresno MA thesis. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Al%2DSammak%2C+Mohammed%2E+2012%2E+Cognate+objects+with+unaccusative+and+unergative+verbs+in+Arabic%2E+California+State+University%2C+Fresno+MA+thesis%2E)
3. Alqurashi, Abdulrahman. 2020. Cognate object constructions in Arabic. International Journal of Linguistics 12(2). 130–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i2.16683 [↗](https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i2.16683)
4. Borer, Hagit. 2005a. Structuring sense: Volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001)
5. Borer, Hagit. 2005b. Structuring sense: Volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001)
6. Borer, Hagit. 2013. Structuring sense: Volume III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001 Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001)
7. Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rapoport and Zarka Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/g jgl.1274 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Corbett%2C+Greville+G%2E+2000%2E+Number%2E+Cambridge%3A+Cambridge+University+Press%2E+Rapoport+and+Zarka+Glossa%3A+a+journal+of+general+linguistics+DOI%3A+10%2E5334%2Fg+jgl%2E1274)
8. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tova Rapoport. 1997. A theory of verbal projection. In G. Matos et al. (eds.), On interfaces in linguistic theory: Selected papers from the International Conference on Interfaces in Linguistics, 129–148. Lisboa: APL/Edições Colibri. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Erteschik%2DShir%2C+Nomi+%26+Tova+Rapoport%2E+1997%2E+A+theory+of+verbal+projection%2E+In+G%2E+Matos+et+al%2E+%28eds%2E%29%2C+On+interfaces+in+linguistic+theory%3A+Selected+papers+from+the+International+Conference+on+Interface)
9. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tova Rapoport. 2000. Aspectual focus. Talk given at G.L.O.W.: Focus Workshop. Bilbao: The University of Deusto. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Erteschik%2DShir%2C+Nomi+%26+Tova+Rapoport%2E+2000%2E+Aspectual+focus%2E+Talk+given+at+G%2EL%2EO%2EW%2E%3A+Focus+Workshop%2E+Bilbao%3A+The+University+of+Deusto%2E)
10. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tova Rapoport. 2004. Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 217–234. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Erteschik%2DShir%2C+Nomi+%26+Tova+Rapoport%2E+2004%2E+Bare+aspect%3A+A+theory+of+syntactic+projection%2E+In+Jacqueline+Gu%C3%A9ron+%26+Jacqueline+Lecarme+%28eds%2E%29%2C+The+syntax+of+time%2C+217%E2%80%93234%2E+Cambridge%2C+Mass%3A+MIT+Press%2E)
11. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tova Rapoport. 2005. Path predicates. In Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds.), The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation, 65–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.001.0001 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280445.001.0001)
12. Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Tova Rapoport. 2010. Contacts and other results. In Malka Rappaport-Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 59–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0004 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0004)
13. Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1984. Agreement, binding and coherence. In Michael Barlow & Charles Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language, approaches, theories, descriptions, 107–158. Stanford: CSLI. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Fassi+Fehri%2C+Abdelkader%2E+1984%2E+Agreement%2C+binding+and+coherence%2E+In+Michael+Barlow+%26+Charles+Ferguson+%28eds%2E%29%2C+Agreement+in+natural+language%2C+approaches%2C+theories%2C+descriptions%2C+107%E2%80%93158%2E+Stanford%3A+CSLI)
14. Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1998. Layers in the distribution of Arabic adverbs and adjectives and their licensing. In Elabbas Benmamoun, Mushira Eid & Niloofar Haeri (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Volume XI: Atlanta, Georgia, 1997, 9–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.167.04feh [↗](https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.167.04feh)
15. Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 1999. Arabic modifying adjectives and DP structures. Studia Linguistica 53(2). 105–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00042 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00042)
16. Geuder, Wilhelm. 2000. Oriented adverbs: Issues in the lexical semantics of event adverbs. Universität Konstanz dissertation. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Geuder%2C+Wilhelm%2E+2000%2E+Oriented+adverbs%3A+Issues+in+the+lexical+semantics+of+event+adverbs%2E+Universit%C3%A4t+Konstanz+dissertation%2E)
17. Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Hale%2C+Kenneth+%26+Samuel+Jay+Keyser%2E+1993%2E+On+argument+structure+and+the+lexical+expression+of+syntactic+relations%2E+In+Kenneth+Hale+%26+Samuel+Jay+Keyser+%28eds%2E%29%2C+The+view+from+Building+20%3A+Essays+in+lingu)
18. Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3. 37–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012949 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700012949)
19. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An Introduction. In Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification: The Typology of Depictives, 1–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.003.0001 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.003.0001)
20. Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74. 101–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(88)90056-3)
21. Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina. 2012. Secondary predicates. University of Toronto dissertation. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Irimia%2C+Monica%2DAlexandrina%2E+2012%2E+Secondary+predicates%2E+University+of+Toronto+dissertation%2E)
22. Ježek, Elisabetta & Chiara Melloni. 2009. Complex types in the (morphologically) complex Lexicon. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, 17–19.‏ Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds.), Event arguments in syntax, semantics, and discourse, 177–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Je%C5%BEek%2C+Elisabetta+%26+Chiara+Melloni%2E+2009%2E+Complex+types+in+the+%28morphologically%29+complex+Lexicon%2E+In+Proceedings+of+the+5th+International+Conference+on+Generative+Approaches+to+the+Lexicon%2C+17%E2%80%9319%2E%E2%80%8F+Kr)
23. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Levin%2C+Beth+%26+Malka+Rappaport+Hovav%2E+1995%2E+Unaccusativity%3A+At+the+syntax%2Dlexical+semantics+interface%2E+Cambridge%2C+MA%3A+MIT+Press%2E)
24. Levinson, Lisa. 2010. Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28. 135–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x [↗](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9089-x)
25. Lohndal, Terje. 2012. Without specifiers: Phrase structure and events. University of Maryland, College Park dissertation. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Lohndal%2C+Terje%2E+2012%2E+Without+specifiers%3A+Phrase+structure+and+events%2E+University+of+Maryland%2C+College+Park+dissertation%2E)
26. Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Handout. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Marantz%2C+Alec%2E+2001%2E+Words%2E+Handout%2E)
27. M.I.T. Massam, Diane. 1990. Cognate objects as thematic objects. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 35(2). 161– 190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008413100013566 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100013566)
28. Mateu Fontanals, Jaume. 2000. Why can’t we wipe the slate clean? A lexical-syntactic approach to resultative constructions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8. 71–95. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Mateu+Fontanals%2C+Jaume%2E+2000%2E+Why+can%E2%80%99t+we+wipe+the+slate+clean%3F+A+lexical%2Dsyntactic+approach+to+resultative+constructions%2E+Catalan+Working+Papers+in+Linguistics+8%2E+71%E2%80%9395%2E)
29. Mateu, Jaume. 2001. Small clause results revisited. ZAS Papers in Linguistics. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax of Predication, 127–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.26.2001.141 [↗](https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.26.2001.141)
30. Mateu, Jaume. 2012. Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Demonte, Violeta & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 252–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o so/9780199693498.003.0010 McCarthy, John J., & Alan S. Prince. 1990. Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(2). 209–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00208524 McNulty, Elaine. 1988. The syntax of adjunct predicates. University of Connecticut, Storrs dissertation. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o)
31. Merlo, Paola. 1988. Secondary predicates in Italian and English. In Joyce Powers and Kenneth de Jong (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 338–348. The Ohio State University. Rapoport and Zarka Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/g jgl.1274 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Merlo%2C+Paola%2E+1988%2E+Secondary+predicates+in+Italian+and+English%2E+In+Joyce+Powers+and+Kenneth+de+Jong+%28eds%2E%29%2C+Proceedings+of+the+Fifth+Eastern+States+Conference+on+Linguistics%2C+338%E2%80%93348%2E+The+Ohio+State+)
32. Milway, Dan. 2019. Explaining the resultative parameter. University of Toronto dissertation. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Milway%2C+Dan%2E+2019%2E+Explaining+the+resultative+parameter%2E+University+of+Toronto+dissertation%2E)
33. Motut, Alexandra. 2010. A puzzle for the syntax-semantics of depictives. In Heijl, Melinda (ed.), Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistics Association. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Motut%2C+Alexandra%2E+2010%2E+A+puzzle+for+the+syntax%2Dsemantics+of+depictives%2E+In+Heijl%2C+Melinda+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Proceedings+of+the+Canadian+Linguistics+Association%2E)
34. Motut, Alexandra. 2014. A semantics for object-oriented depictives. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Motut%2C+Alexandra%2E+2014%2E+A+semantics+for+object%2Doriented+depictives%2E+In+University+of+Pennsylvania+Working+Papers+in+Linguistics+20%2E)
35. Napoli, Donna Jo. 1992. Secondary resultative predicates in Italian. Journal of Linguistics 28. 53–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014997 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700014997)
36. Nehmad, Olga & Amit Kempler. 2018. The semantics and pragmatics of telicity. Ms. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Nehmad%2C+Olga+%26+Amit+Kempler%2E+2018%2E+The+semantics+and+pragmatics+of+telicity%2E+Ms%2E+Ben%2DGurion+University+of+the+Negev%2E)
37. Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2002. Cognate objects in Modern and Biblical Hebrew. In Jamal Ouhalla & Ur Shlonsky (eds.), Themes in Arabic and Hebrew Syntax, 107–136. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0351-3_4 Piñón, Christopher. 2008. Verbs of creation. In Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 493–521. Berlin: De Gruyter. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0351-3_4)
38. Pustejovsky, James 1989. The geometry of events. In Tenny, Carol (ed.), Generative approaches to aspect. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Lexicon Project. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Pustejovsky%2C+James+1989%2E+The+geometry+of+events%2E+In+Tenny%2C+Carol+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Generative+approaches+to+aspect%2E+Cambridge%2C+Mass%3A+MIT+Lexicon+Project%2E)
39. Pustojovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41. 47–81. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-Y Rapoport, Tova. 1993. Stage and adjunct predicates: Licensing and structure in secondary predication constructions. In Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds.), Knowledge and language, Volume II: Lexical and conceptual structure, 157–182. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1007/978-94-011-1842-2_8 Rapoport, Tova. 1999. Structure, aspect and the predicate. Language 75. 653–676. DOI: https://doi. org/10.2307/417729 Rapoport, Tova. 2014. Verb meaning and context: a criticism of manner-result complementarity. In G. Girard-Gillet (ed.), Autour du verbe Anglais: Construction, lexique, evidentialité, 121–137. Paris: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-y)
40. Rapoport, Tova. 2015. Secondary predication: Aspects of resultatives and depictives. Talk given at the Catalonia-Israel Symposium. The Hebrew University. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Rapoport%2C+Tova%2E+2015%2E+Secondary+predication%3A+Aspects+of+resultatives+and+depictives%2E+Talk+given+at+the+Catalonia%2DIsrael+Symposium%2E+The+Hebrew+University%2E)
41. Rapoport, Tova. 2019. Secondary predication. In Robert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 426–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.19 Rapoport, Tova & Aya Zarka. 2020. Creation verb structures and secondary predicates in Levantine Arabic. Talk given at MOTH, University of Toronto. Rapoport, Tova & Aya Zarka. In preparation. Cognate objects in Arabic. Ms. Ben-Gurion University and McMaster University. [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/)
42. Ritter, Elizabeth & Sara Thomas Rosen. 1998. Delimiting events in syntax. In Butt, Miriam & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors, 135–164. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Ritter%2C+Elizabeth+%26+Sara+Thomas+Rosen%2E+1998%2E+Delimiting+events+in+syntax%2E+In+Butt%2C+Miriam+%26+Wilhelm+Geuder+%28eds%2E%29%2C+The+projection+of+arguments%3A+Lexical+and+compositional+factors%2C+135%E2%80%93164%2E+Stanford%3A+CS)
43. Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486975 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511486975)
44. Sailer, Manfred. 2010. The family of English cognate object constructions. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 191– 211. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Sailer%2C+Manfred%2E+2010%2E+The+family+of+English+cognate+object+constructions%2E+In+Stefan+M%C3%BCller+%28ed%2E%29%2C+Proceedings+of+the+17th+International+Conference+on+Head%2DDriven+Phrase+Structure+Grammar%2C+191%E2%80%93+211%2E+S)
45. Segal, Zehavit & Idan Landau. 2012. Clear from and clear of: The asymmetric syntax of detaching. The Linguistic Review, 223–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0009 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2012-0009)
46. Simpson, Jane. 1983. Aspects of Warlpiri morphology and syntax. MIT dissertation. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Simpson%2C+Jane%2E+1983%2E+Aspects+of+Warlpiri+morphology+and+syntax%2E+MIT+dissertation%2E)
47. Simpson, Jane. 2005. Depictives in English and Warlpiri. In Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva F. Schultze-Berndt (eds.), Secondary predication and adverbial modification, 69–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.003.0002 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272266.003.0002)
48. Tenny, Carol. 1987. Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness. MIT dissertation. van Voorst, Jan. 1988. Event structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.59 Washio, Ryuichi. 1997. Resultatives, compositionality and language variation. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6. 1–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008257704110 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.59)
49. Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238. [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Williams%2C+Edwin%2E+1980%2E+Predication%2E+Linguistic+Inquiry+11%2E+203%E2%80%93238%2E)
50. Williams, Edwin. 1987. NP trace and theta theory. Linguistics and Philosophy 10. 203–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00628065 Zarka, Aya. 2019. False resultatives in Levantine Arabic: The case of creation verbs. MA Thesis. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Zarka, Aya. In preparation. Differential object marking in Levantine Arabic. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev and McMaster University. Rapoport and Zarka Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/g jgl.1274 Rapoport and Zarka Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI: 10.5334/g jgl.1274 [↗](https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00628065)
51. TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Rapoport, Tova and Aya Zarka. 2021. False resultatives: The interaction of agreement and creation in Northern Galilee Levantine Arabic. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 19. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274 [↗](https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1274) [our card](https://md.mova.elamur.ai/free/en/docs/papers/lingbulk-2021-rapoport-false-resultatives-interaction-agreement-creation/)
52. Submitted: 07 April 2020 Accepted: 16 October 2020 Published: 16 February 2021 [find](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Submitted%3A+07+April+2020+Accepted%3A+16+October+2020+Published%3A+16+February+2021)
53. COPYRIGHT: © 2021 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See [http://creativecommons.org/](http://creativecommons.org/) licenses/by/4.0/. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics is a peer-reviewed open access journal published by Ubiquity Press. [↗](http://creativecommons.org/)